Scientific reviewed journal “Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy”.
ISSN 2306-1340 (Print). ISSN 2410-8812 (Online).
The certificate of registration of mass media of February 2, 2016 PI № FS 77-64762 issued by the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Communications (Roskomnadzor).
Index Catalogue of the Russian Press “Russian Post” – 31725.
The scientific journal “Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy” is included: in the List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degrees of candidate of sciences and doctor of science must be published.
- Aims and Scope
- Sections of the Journal
- Open Access Policy
- Journal’s Indexing
- Publishing Ethics
- Author fees
- Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
- Plagiarism detection
- Preprint and postprint Policy
Founder, Journal Sponsorship
Private educational institution of higher education “The Omsk Law Academy”.
Chair of editorial board, editor-in-chief – Yu. P. Solovey, Doctor of Law, Professor, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation (Omsk);
Deputy editor-in-chief – I. V. Popov, Doctor of Law, Associate-professor (Omsk);
Deputy editor-in-chief – D. T. Karamanukyan, Candidate of Law Sciences, Associate-professor (Omsk);
Yu. V. Derishev, Doctor of Law, Professor, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation (Omsk);
Yu. V. Anokhin, Doctor of Law, Associate-professor (Barnaul);
V. V. Baburin, Doctor of Law, Professor (Omsk);
O. I. Beketov, Doctor of Law, Professor, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation (Omsk);
Mr Rajeev Gundur - PhD, University of Liverpool in Singapore;
Yu. V. Gerasimenko, Doctor of Law, Professor, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation (Omsk);
M. A. Kozhevina, Doctor of Law, Associate-professor (Omsk);
P. I. Kononov - Doctor of Law, Professor (Kirov);
I. D. Kuzmina, Doctor of Law, Associate-professor (Kemerovo);
V. F. Lugovik, Doctor of Law, Professor; Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation (Omsk);
R. D. Sharapov, Doctor of Law, Professor (Tyumen);
N. N. Tsukanov, Doctor of Law, Associate-professor (Krasnoyarsk);
I. G. Ragozina, Candidate of Law Sciences, Associate-professor (Executive secretary) (Omsk).
Aims and Scope
The modern stage of legal development in the Russian Federation is characterized by constant changes in legislation which demands the operational exchange of domestic and foreign experience. Through accumulation of new knowledge in the sphere of jurisprudence the journal “Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy” is a kind of a plot where scientists and practitioners can not only tell about the achievements and results of their research work but also acquaint themselves with the experience of their colleagues and exchange the most perspective proposals concerning legal science and practice. Among our authors there are scientists, workers of law-enforcement system, of state agencies and functionaries interested in the proper ensuring of legal rights and interests of a person. It makes the journal to be urgent in the international scientific area. The journal elucidates the most problematic and disputable legal branches and it causes the increased interest of the scientific world in the papers published. Thus the aim of the journal is the formation of the united scientific world, exchange the results of scientific achievements in the sphere of jurisprudence and law-enforcement practice.
Achieving the declared aims and performing the magazine mission is associated with the tasks set for it:
- promotion of the fundamental and applied scientific research results, that expand and deepen the understanding of the most important topics in jurisprudence;
- providing for the efficient communication between the authors and the readers for satisfying their need for information and for their achieving the maximum results in professional activities;
- the analysis of the achievements of international and domestic experience in the field of jurisprudence and law enforcement practice;
- coverage of the most interesting, relevant and breakthrough results of scientific creativity of academic lawyers;
- formation of professional legal awareness and human resources in Russia and abroad;
- continuity of knowledge through the exchange of experience between top-level scientists and young scientists.
We hope that the scientific journal "Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy" will contribute to the development of Russian science, will enable the consolidation of world experience in the field of law and will contribute to the formation of a single legal space.
Sections of the Journal
1. State and Law Theory. This section considers and examines the key points of forming and developing state and law theory, the influence individual legal acts have on further development of state and law theory, suggests new approaches and proposals to solve current problems of the modern theory of state and law.
2. Constitutional and international law. The section studies the legal nature of national and international institutions protecting human rights, issues of their legal regulation in legislation and law enforcement of the countries and integrated associations.
3. Administrative law. This section deals with different aspects of current regulation by administrative law, administrative procedures in different spheres and administrative responsibility.
4. Employment law and social security law. The section focuses on protection of labour rights, legal regulation of labour, social security, current problems of legislative regulation, law implementation activity and court practice on labour relations.
5. Civil law. The section publishes articles and analytical materials on material and procedural aspects of private legal relations: comments on the current legislation, characteristics of law implementation practice, assessment of arbitration courts’ activity, general jurisdiction courts’ activity and notary offices’ activity.
6. Criminal law and criminology. The section comprises the comments on current laws, analyses the problems of classifying crimes, contemporary criminal law policy and measures for counteracting crime.
7. Criminal procedure and forensics. The section reviews current problems of theory of criminal procedural law, forensics and crime detection. It covers the analysis and review of prosecutors’, investigative and judicial practice, interprets the Russian Constitutional and Russian Supreme Court view on criminal trial proceedings.
8. Tribune of Young Scientists
Open Access Policy
"Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy" is an open access journal. All articles are made freely available to readers immediatly upon publication. Our open access policy is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition - it means that articles have free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself.
For more information please read BOAI statement.
Russian State Library (RSL)
- Manuscripts are admitted only if all the requirements given at the journal website and in the journal’s current issues are met. Manuscripts formatted improperly are neither considered nor returned.
- All scientific articles submitted to the editorial are subject to revision. "Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy" use native russian-language plagiarism detection software Antiplagiat to screen the submissions. If plagiarism is identified, the COPE guidelines on plagiarism will be followed.
- The editor-in-chief determines if the article complies with the journal’s themes, requirements for formatting and submits it for reviewing.
- All the articles which are in accordance with the journal’s themes and requirements are subject to revision.
- Authoritative scholars (Doctors and Candidates of sciences) working in the field the article covers as well as invited specialists can review the articles.
- The reviewer examines the submitted article and sends to the editorial (by e-mail, post, personally) the review or motivated rejection to review the article.
- The review shall estimate:
- relevance of the theme, science level, terminology, structure of the manuscript;
- readiness of the manuscript to be submitted for publishing with regard to language and style, conformity of the content of the article with its title and requirements for formatting;
- scientific character of explaining the material, conformity of the author’s methods, recommendations and research results with the current achievements in science and practice;
- logics in describing the material and structuring of the submitted article.
- In his statement the reviewer makes a general conclusion: to recommend the article for publishing; to recommend the article for publishing after elaborating it with page proofs considered; not to recommend the article for publishing. If after the article has been elaborated, with page proofs being considered, the reviewer does not recommend it or does not recommend it from the very beginning, the review should contain the reasons for making such a decision.
- The reviewer reserves the right to persuade the author to change and detail the manuscript which is further sent (via the journal’s editorial) to the author for elaboration. In this case the date of receiving the article by the editorial is the date of submitting the article after enhancement. The improved article is submitted for review for the second time.
- The reviewers are not allowed to make copies of the manuscripts for their purposes without the author’s prior permission.
- After receiving the review the successive meeting of the editorial board considers the received reviews and makes a final decision on publishing or rejecting the articles.
- The authors whose manuscripts have been rejected receive reasonable motives.
- If the author disagrees with the reviewer, the editorial board can submit the manuscript for additional review.
- If required in a written form, the review is returned to the author and to the Higher Attestation Commission (VAK) of the Russian Ministry of Education and Science.
- The editorial neither keeps nor returns the manuscripts not accepted for publishing.
The scientific journal “Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy” is included:
– in the List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degrees of candidate of sciences and doctor of science must be published;
– the database “Russian science citation index” (www.elibrary.ru);
– Digital Object Identifier system (DOI) – standard designation of information about the object in the “Internet” information and telecommunications network, adopted in the English-speaking academic environment (www.crossref.org);
– Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory is an authoritative database that contains bibliographic information about scientific periodicals of the world (www.ulrichsweb.com);
– European Reference Index for the Humanities and the Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS) – a reference database on the humanities and social sciences (erihplus.nsd.no);
– Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) (www.doaj.org);
– legal information database “GARANT System”;
– legal information database "ConsultantPlus";
– scientific electronic library “CyberLeninka” (Cyberleninka.ru).
The Editorial Board, the Editor-in-Chief and the Publisher of Scientific reviewed journal “Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy” espouse certain ethical principles, which they believe also makes for high quality and intellectual continuity of The Scientific Journal’s content. These principles are as follows.
In authorship ethics
No author shall submit a paper that has already been published or submitted for publication as essentially the same content to another publisher.
2. No plagiarism.
Any text or verbal pronouncement by an extraneous author must be properly referenced, with the help of a list of references or otherwise, in accordance with the publication rules followed by The Scientific Journal “Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy”. Compiling or paraphrasing texts or verbal pronouncements by extraneous authors without making appropriate references is inadmissible.
3. Fair authorship.
An article’s list of authors must consist only of the names of researchers who contributed to the article. No researcher who made a significant contribution shall be crossed out of the list. Any change to the list, including crossing out, is subject to approval by every author in the list to be changed.
4. Confirmation of sources.
No entry in an article’s list of references shall contain any uncertainty or ambiguity concerning bibliographic or other details of its cited source. No reference made in the main body of an article shall come without its entry in the list of references. No article shall contain information or data obtained from private sources such as private correspondence or private verbal communication.
5. Honesty about conflict of interest in reviewing.
To make for impartiality in evaluating a submitted article, its author(s) must notify The Scientific Journal of possible conflicts of interest in the evaluation process.
6. Readiness to acknowledge error in published material.
Having discovered an error or gaffe in any of his (her) already published articles, an author shall immediately notify The Scientific Journal of this and help it deal with the mishap. In case a person other than author discovers an error or gaffe in a published article and informs The Scientific Journal of this, the article’s author(s) must either supply The Scientific Journal with convincing evidence that his (her, their) original version is right, correct the discovered error or gaffe or formally disavow the article.
In reviewing ethics
1. Independence and impartiality.
Reviewing of submitted papers must be honest, impartial, unprejudiced and uninfluenced by any personal attitudes, likes or dislikes. Having discovered a conflict of interest in himself (herself) in connection with a paper forwarded to him (her) for reviewing, a reviewer must step down as such in everything that concerns this paper.
A paper forwarded for reviewing must be treated by the reviewer as confidential material. No part of the paper or the paper as a whole shall be used by the reviewer for any purpose without the consent of the author(s). The content of the paper is no matter for discussion with anybody outside The Scientific Journal.
In case a reviewer finds that a paper forwarded to him (her) for reviewing is outside his (her) scope, he (she) must immediately inform The Scientific Journal of this and decline its request to review this paper.
4. Fairness in not forwarding material to reviewers.
The Scientific Journal reserves the right not to forward a submitted paper to reviewers, but only for invoking in instances when this paper does not meet formal requirements, defies fair authorship rules or fails to pass an anti-plagiarism check.
5. Compliance with rules of reviewing.
Reviewing of submitted papers must be carried out in strict compliance with the rules of reviewing adopted by The Scientific Journal.
In editing ethics
1. Openness concerning rules.
The wordings of The Scientific Journal’s requirements to submitted papers must be freely available to potential authors on the Internet. The Scientific Journal shall not require anything that goes beyond these avowed requirements.
2. Openness and promptness in exchanges with authors and reviewers.
The Scientific Journal expeditiously answers all questions it receives from authors and reviewers. It is always forthcoming to explain whatever is necessary concerning its work and that of its reviewers. It also reserves the right to seek clarifications from the author(s) and the reviewers of a submitted paper.
3. Avoidance of conflict of interest.
No editor shall take any decision concerning a submitted paper unless he (she) is in good faith about the absence of conflict of interest in him (her) in connection with this paper.
4. No change that is hidden from author.
The author(s) of a paper to be published shall not be kept in the dark as to any change, semantic or concerning content, that has been introduced to his (her, their) paper by The Scientific Journal’s editors in the course of pre-publication preparation work.
In publisher’s ethics
1. Equal treatment of all submitted papers.
In its selection policy, The Scientific Journal guarantees equal treatment of all submitted papers regardless of nationality, ethnicity, faith, occupation or position of their authors. No commercial interest shall be allowed to influence decisions taken by The Scientific Journal. The Scientific Journal’s publishing policy rests on respect of author’s rights, including copyright and other intellectual property rights.
2. Unbiased evaluation of submitted material.
In its work to evaluate submitted material The Scientific Journal is guided by the criteria of importance, scientific value, topicality, veracity, originality, comprehensiveness, literary quality and compliance with The Scientific Journal’s technical requirements to submitted papers.
3. High quality of reviewing.
The Scientific Journal guarantees that each and every submitted paper will be reviewed by highly competent and properly qualified experts in law and other relevant fields.
4. Openness about research funding.
The Scientific Journal is committed to full disclosure of information about funds and sponsors behind a published research article.
Publication in "Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy” is free of charge for all the authors.
The journal doesn't have any Arcticle processing charges.
The journal doesn't have any Article submission charges.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
“Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy” use native russian-language plagiarism detection software Antiplagiat to screen the submissions. If plagiarism is identified, the COPE guidelines on plagiarism will be followed.
Preprint and postprint Policy
Prior to acceptance and publication in “Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy”, authors may make their submissions available as preprints on personal or public websites.
As part of submission process, authors are required to confirm that the submission has not been previously published, nor has been submitted. After a manuscript has been published in “Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy” we suggest that the link to the article on journal's website is used when the article is shared on personal or public websites.
“Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy” has been published since 2004.
The title of the journal was changed in 2012. The previous title of the journal was “Vestnik of the Omsk Law Institute”.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.